Taxonomy of The Internet Loon: It’s Loontastic! (UPDATED)
April 18, 2009
Jason Rosenhouse of Evolution Blog linked to Comrade Physioprof’s teabagger post, and some really tasty loonballs came out of the woodwork in the comments to his post. They were so loontastic, I felt obliged to share them with my readers.
First, we have “I’m never reading your blog again” loon, Eric:
The content on the page you linked is an embarrassment. I’m sad to see that you condone it. This will be my last visit to your blog.
HAHAHAHAH! Is there any way to use the word “condone” that doesn’t immediately mark the utterer as a complete total motherfucking loon?
I would recommend replacing this link with one that’s cleaner and more coherent, expressing its viewpoint more appropriately. I don’t agree with its viewpoint, but this is a country of free speech.
You just shouldn’t condone something this nasty.
Another with the fucking “condone”! This gcs15 nutter is also of the “I punish you by dramatically not reading your blog” variety:
Thanks, SLC, think I’ll pass on those blogs. I don’t need profanity or name calling to make myself understood, and neither should anyone else. Why on earth I should mosey over to experience profane ranting, I have no idea.
But thanks for the heads up regarding which blogs not to waste my time on.
This once again proves the old adage that there is no argument more convincing than a vicious string of ad hominem attacks.
Hey, shitmonkey: insulting people for being stone-cold pig-ignorant dumbfucks is not an ad hominem attack. Asserting that what they happen to be arguing–and it is stretching the term “argue” to apply it to these teabagger wackanuts, who are really just grunting at the behest of gutter-dwelling right-wing slime like Gingrich–is wrong because they are stone-cold pig-ignorant dumbfucks is ad hominem.
I never said a single word about their “arguments”. In fact, the delusion that everything written on the internetz must be a “rational argument” that must be “supported” and “debated” represents a common loon trait–at least among the ones who seem to set themselves off when reading Comrade PhysioProf’s pellucid prose. Here’s a motherfucking clue: mocking the shit out of dumbfuck assholes is part of what we do here. That fucknut Michael Hawkins represents an extreme example of this high-school debate-team species of internet loon.
Finally, we’ve got “bringing political discourse to a new low drama queen”, Psychprof:
Physioprof should get a prize for bringing political discourse to a new low. Maybe he or she just thinks political topics don’t deserve evidence or reason to make a point. On second thought, I suppose he or she saw enough evidence to justify, in his or her own mind, hatred for people who protest taxes.
Psychprof also seems to have a touch of the high-school debate-team phenotype, with the “evidence”, “reason”, and “justification” fetishism. HAHAHAHAH!
Internet loons are LOONTASTIC!!!!11!!
Leni, my good moron, no doubt you would have decried the original tea party as a childish political stunt whilst wearing a powdered wig, girdle, and pledging allegiance to King George.
AHAHAHAHAHAH! Freakball just insulted someone by accusing them of having Loyalist sympathies! THAT IS BEAUTIFUL!!!!!
Well, that is easily explained by the fact that [Abbie Smith and Comrade PhysioProf] are low-rent, trifling pieces of ****.
We are low-rent, trifling pieces of gold, fish, sand, wut!?!?!?
I’m telling ya, this shit just writes itself!